Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Kasich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kasich. Show all posts

Thursday, June 9, 2011

Kasich's Pension Hypocrisy

It's an old article that's linked below, but I still can't get over the irony of Kasich's Lehman Brothers work, his scapegoating of firemen, teachers, & police for the economic problems we find ourselves in, and his advocacy for "merit pay". Here's a man who worked as a managing director for an investment company whose bankruptcy was the largest in U.S. history. Lehman's sleazy practices and subsequent failure played a big role in the recent financial crisis.   Was Governor Kasich involved in these unethical practices that helped tank the global economy? Probably not. But he did try to persuade the Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund and the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System to invest with Lehman. Both purchased funds from Lehman, although the governor's efforts may not have played a role in the purchases, they lost hundreds of millions. The governor is now blaming the pension systems of these same "greedy" firemen, policemen, public employees, and teachers for the state's economic woes. That takes chutzpah. Was his multimillion dollar  salary some form of merit pay?

http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2010/05/12/copy/candidate-connected-pensions-lehman.html?sid=101

Monday, June 6, 2011

The True Monetary Cost of Education Reform in Ohio

"Our illustrious Ohio Republican leadership is pitching a fit over this legislation that will increase the annual cost of state assessments from the FY2011 budgeted amount of $56,703,265 to a staggering $305,369,575.  Will that also be spun to be the fault of the teacher unions and local district mismanagement?
These people are just brilliant.  Why do we even try to argue educational philosophy when they can’t even comprehend the basic financial implications of this legislation?"

Great read: http://www.plunderbund.com/2011/06/04/doing-the-math-batchelder-wants-addl-330-million-for-education/

Friday, May 27, 2011

Great to take the long view, Governor

"After a separate public appearance in St. Clairsville yesterday, Kasich rejected the notion that Stewart's departure is related to Senate Bill 5. He also said he hadn't entertained the possibility that the bill might cause Republican political casualties.
'That's the first time anyone's ever said that to me. I'll just have to think about it,' Kasich said."

Really Governor Kasich? You never entertained the possibility that pushing through this vindictive train-wreck of a bill that devalues firefighters, policemen, and teachers might cost Republicans seats? You really have no idea what you're doing to the future of the Republican party in Ohio, do you?


http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2011/05/27/senator-denies-sb-5-backlash-prompting-resignation.html?sid=101&adsec=politics

Monday, May 23, 2011

Senate Speeches SB 5 Debate - Senator Tim Grendell - ProgressOhio

Senate Speeches SB 5 Debate - Senator Tim Grendell - ProgressOhio

Thank you Senator Grendell. Another Republican who gets it.  

Some Republicans Get It

Seitz has some good advice for the governor in this article. Also of note, he claims that Senate Republican leaders "behaved in a petty and vindictive way" in removing his chairmanship from him.I agree, Senator. It's the same vindictiveness that drives 85% of SB5, at least in relation to teachers.

"Gov. John Kasich should become more of a consensus-builder as he guides Ohio through one of the most challenging periods in its history, state Sen. Bill Seitz said Friday..."


http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2FAB%2F20110429%2FNEWS0108%2F104300336%2F

Saturday, May 21, 2011

Kasich & the Bureaucracy Hypocrisy

"Putting money in the bureaucracy is not the ticket. It's dollars in the classroom" -John Kasich

I guess the governor forgot about this promise when he created his education reform plan, which takes dollars out of the classroom and creates vast new bureaucracies. How many people will be employed by the state to formulate the "merit" pay formulas and assessments? Implementation? Evaluation (after it becomes clear to even his followers that the system has too many flaws)? What will be the cost of their salaries and benefits? How much red tape will local schools have to follow to be compliant? Bureaucracy. Bureaucracy. Bureaucracy.

What will the additional costs be to perform the additional teacher evaluations? Most principals are able to exercise situational leadership. This plan takes away their ability to do so and mandates that either most of their time be spent on observations and conferences or that they hire additional administrators to do the evaluations. Costs. Costs. Costs. (Outside of the classroom).

Listen to the Governor's own words:

I spent years disliking Jon Stewart. He's on target here, though.

As a Republican Jon Stewart has often agitated me. In the past few months, however, I've come to appreciate how he's put things into perspective with levity. This one is a must see.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-march-3-2011/crisis-in-the-dairyland---for-richer-and-poorer---teachers-and-wall-street?xrs=share_fb

Friday, May 20, 2011

How Ohio's Budget Battle Could Decide Who Wins the White House

"...But a funny thing happened on the way to political nirvana: one by one, Walker’s fellow Republican governors began to come out against his hardline proposals. Last week Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad and Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett said they would not repeal collective bargaining. In Indiana, Gov. Mitch Daniels asked Republican lawmakers to table legislation that mirrored Wisconsin’s. “There [is] a better time and place to have this … issue raised,” he said. Even Garden State Gov. Chris Christie, who’s spent the past year branding himself as the party’s most avid union adversary, refused to adopt Walker’s tactics, telling The New York Times that “I’m ready to embrace the collective-bargaining situation.” By the time Gallup released a poll last week showing that 61 percent of voters oppose laws designed to do away with collective bargaining, there were few Republican governors on Walker’s side.
All of which invites an important question: have Republicans gone too far, damaging their political prospects in the process? Or are Christie, Daniels, Branstad, and Corbett missing some sort of golden opportunity here? Ohio may be the best place to look for answers. In part that’s because Kasich is one of the only governors still waging war on collective bargaining. But it’s also because the political stakes are higher in Ohio than almost anywhere else. In the general assembly, Republicans outnumber Democrats 82 to 50, which means the bill has a better chance of passing than in the more evenly divided Wisconsin legislature. But it also means a lot of Republican lawmakers now represent union-heavy districts that usually elect Democrats. If they overreach, they risk losing their seats. The presidential politics are even chancier. Since 1944, Ohioans have sided with the losing candidate only once—opting for Nixon over Kennedy in 1960—and few Republicans have won the White House without winning the state’s electoral votes. Any passions unleashed by the collective-bargain battle could alter the local political landscape heading into 2012—and potentially swing a crucial battleground state. “Something like this can tilt the balance one way or the other quite easily,” says John C. Green, a political-science professor at the University of Akron. “It really doesn’t take very much in Ohio.”

http://www.newsweek.com/2011/02/27/showdown.html